Wednesday, April 27, 2011
THE DO GOODER
Anyways, just wanted to share a new film I starred in called, THE DO GOODER, directed by my dear friends Emmy Pickett and Jimi Patterson. The film is very musical with keen attention to details, rhythm, timing and a core story. I have every song in it stuck in my head and the images (aside from me being a complete narcissist now) are also stuck in my head.
I hope you enjoy it, and tell Jimi and Emmy that you liked it by visiting their vimeo page and giving them loads of compliments.
Check it HERE.
CLICK IT. DO IT.
Love it. Also check out the trailer, which is equally entertaining HERE.
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Waiting to Hear: Where are the voices of the Title IX Signatories?
Often times with feminist issues and leaders, if you are not with them, you are against them. Sometimes we fear to ask questions of our feminist leaders, for fear of seeming contrarian. I am not. However, Trying to speak out with an alternative vision for feminism can be particularly difficult for fear of being perceived as being a chauvinist, a self-hating feminist, or as Gloria Steinem said, “If you are not a feminist, you are a masochist.”
However, I am feminist. A large majority people in the Yale community, including myself, thought something had to be done about the way Yale handles cases of sexual harassment and assault. However, judging by the general sentiment I have experienced, many people in the Yale community are more frustrated than pleased with how the 16 signatories of the Title IX complaint went about their way in reforming Yale’s sexual grievance system in near secrecy, without any community lead up or dialogue before going to the Federal government.
I know that what the Title IX complaint is trying to do is reform the institutional inner workings of Yale's policies surrounding sexual harassment and assault. I agree something had to be done, but the fact that there was no public lead up calls into question some of the tactics they used. Of course they got results, but I often wonder at what expense? Especially when they have not voiced their complaints in the Yale student community as directly as they have to national news... The result is a lot of miscommunication on campus. A lot of frustration. A lot of unnecessary sexual jokes and at times, hostilities towards what has been called an "unnecessary and wasteful investigation." As I overheard someone at lunch the other day, this was an "Egregious waste of Federal spending on an investigation that could take place internally." I disagree that this was a waste of spending or a waste of time---something had to happen! However, I think that there has to be major clarifications about the nature of what the Title IX complaint entails, how it was created, etc.
Basically, what I hope and expect is that the public representatives of the Title IX Signatories step forward and explain directly to their peers the nature of their investigation and what it entails, and more importantly, why they chose the tactics they did with so little lead up. If we are to follow our feminist spearheads, we want to know what exactly they are saying.
I just really hope that the Yale community clarifies something that could be potentially divisive in the student body. Title IX can be a very positive step for change, so long as we accept it as such and not misconstrue or misconceive its implications.
Monday, April 4, 2011
Title IX: From a Closeted Feminist
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
After hibernation, I'm back: provoked by ROTC and Columbia
What actually prompted my voice again was the egregious treatment of a wounded veteran and student at Columbia University.
Check it out:
Here
and Here
Now, if there is something that makes my blood boil, its discrimination against people of color (I say this to describe anyone who is not "white," as also proscribed by a Diversity conference I attended. I know the debate here too), gay, lesbian, transgendered, bi, women, or disabled. For a long time, my support of ROTC was tarnished by Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT) but when it was repealed, I was overjoyed. For a traditionally "conservative" institution, this had to be a huge move that I applauded. To me, this was as enormous step in rights of LGBT peoples and towards social progress in America.
Now, if there is something else that makes my blood boil and churn, it is the mocking or disrespect towards a wounded soldier. Regardless of whether you support wars, conflicts, humanitarian missions, or not (or the other myriad of functions the military plays), a wounded man is a wounded man who suffered a lot to be alive where he is today. A veteran is not "THE MAN" but only a man who happens to have gone through a lot more than most Americans could handle. He is still probably going through things that he cannot handle without much difficulty and struggle. Shame on those disrespectful students who boo a wounded man.
Columbias students' signs "The Military Preys on Low Income Communities" might have a point or an observation. However, this should in no way be a source of legitimacy to ban ROTC, a source of bringing highly educated, talented, and schooled individuals into the army. If anything, the re-introduction of ROTC into the Ivy League could change the military's operation, its values, and its operations. An educated soldier is a force to be reckoned with, one who can (someday) even climb the ranks and gradually shift the military to a new and better place.
Protesting alone and insulting victims of war will not change the military but only create a larger problem. Dialogue from the outside, but also, more importantly, within the military is the MOST IMPORTANT. If anything, internal dialogue, brought about by educated persons from NYU, Davidson, Yale, University of Pittsburgh, Pomona, Harvard, Columbia, and everywhere around the country, is perhaps the most powerful force of change for the military, not the isolation of the military--- that would only create a larger gap between America and a military filled with old, stern, and hardened men and a bunch of "low income" victims.
I encourage ROTC on college campuses as a force of creating more dialogue, change, and progress in US Armed Forces.
I support our troops. I support our LGBT community. I support our women and men. I may not support certain military decisions.
I will scorn those who hiss at a gunshot victim who has put on a uniform for our country. I will equally scorn those who discriminate against any person of color, gender, sexual preference, or religious identity. Out of a sort of nausea, something inside of me really wants to say "Get Real" Columbia, but instead, I'll say, "Rethink this, Columbia." I know Yale has been.
Note: If my terminology, so important in civil and social rights, has in any way offended or has been misattributed, I apologize. I really did carefully consider my word choices. I hope my sister is proud.
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Social Media, The Music Industry and Global Good: Chats with Lupe Fiasco, Kenna and more!
and a smallpox blanket to keep us warm
on a 747 on the pentagon lawn
wake up the alarm clock is connected to a bomb
anthrax lab on a w. Virginia farm
shorty ain't learned to walk already heavily armed
civilians and little children is especially harmed
camouflaged Torahs, Bibles and glorious qurans
the books that take you to heaven and let you meet the Lord there
have become misinterpreted, reasons for warfare
we read 'em with blind eyes I guarantee you there's more there" --Lupe Fiasco's "American Terrorist"
Grassroots Girls Go Global and $40 BILLION CAMPAIGN!
CEO of Vivanista (a social network of philanthropists and fundraisers), Layne Gray, asked a panel of women involved in strategic, philanthropic, and aid agencies for women and children, "Its been 10 years since the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) have been announced. We are still struggling with universal education (2) gender equality (3) child health (4) and maternal health (5). How do we amp up conversation about women's issues?"
With 5 years left to meet the UN MDGs, we do not have much time. At this moment, the photo in TIME of the Afghan women whose nose had been cut off pops into my head. Gender Equality for Afghanistan?
Four other women sit on the panel, clearly eager, angry, talented, and hopeful. They respond. Nainab Salibi goes first. She is the Founder of Women for Women International, who has been described as a new age Mother Theresa, only "better dressed." As an Iraqi whose father flew Saddam Hussein's private plane, she knows a thing or two about war. Her organization has touched 270,000 women and girls in conflict zones by providing access to education and scholarships, practical jobs, and other support to empower women in places like Bosnia, Afghanistan, Rwanda. By offering "Women to women" partnerships where a wealthier woman sponsors another woman in exchange for letters or photos, her organization creates hope for women (ranging from Bosnian rape camps to the hills in Afghanistan) who say, "I'm too hopeless to be helped." Zainab calls for "Humility and help, and a greater interaction between American women and women abroad." Right now, $0.02 of every $1.00 of aid goes to girls/women. She calls for amping up the March 8th World Women's Day in the US. She described Women's day in Bosnia as a time filled with flowers, where a Bosniak woman can hold the hand of a Serbian woman and say "Enough is enough." For Zainab, women in the US need to say, "Enough is enough" as well. "This is the women's and girl's century. We need to speak up and speak loud, get angry!"
Nancy Lublin, the CEO of DoSomething is feisty. Her organization has empowered over 1 million kids and teens to create projects that aid others abroad and at home. She says, "If you look on Google Analytics and research crisis stories on Tsunamis or Katrina, you don't get much." When women and girls depend on the connection and story and there is simply no story, how can they help? On top of that, 10 years after the MDGs, they have not been fulfilled. On TOP of that, organizations trying to meet the goals depend a lot on the generosity of "feisty, ambitious, and powerful" women and girls in America who donate $5 or $27 here or there. "Where is the corporate funding? 10 years after the MDGs, this is a global embarrassment! God is pissed. She's really mad!" Her call? Make the STORY! BLog! Get the word out. Her message? "25,000 girls under 15 will become child brides TODAY alone. Be pissed. Tweet it! Tell the story. Do Something!"
yet i'm sitting here. I like the hopeful women sitting in front of me and the work they do. Its really powerful and really effective. I've worked with something like Women for Women before, called Women for Afghan Women. I know they do good, effective, powerful work.
Just arrived: UN Week's Digital Media Lounge
I'm here at 92Y, one of New York's largest community and cultural centers. Immediately, I'm directed towards a room with large double doors, where there a few hundred bloggers are holding mics up to each other's faces, interviewing Marianne Williamson, number one best selling author who had just spoken, and typing away at Twitter and blogger, facebook and more.
Now I'm off to listen to a "What girls can teach the world" panel. Kimberly Perry, director of Girl Up, Nancy Lublin CEO of DoSomething, Zainab Salibi, Founder of Women for Women International, Nancy Zhang, INternational Trustee, Key club teen, and Layne Gray, CEO of Vivanista.